UNI Presidential Review Committee Report Slams Allen
Allen ranks strongest in leadership representing university to external constituents, but overall gets poor marks in a survey.
A new report shows more dissastisfaction, on the part of faculty, of University of Northern Iowa President Ben Allen.
Among the most critical aspects of the report, which includes a detailed survey, come in the conclusion. The conclusion begins by asserting there is an overall concern about Allen's leadership.
"Overall, the faculty questionnaire results indicate that the UNI Faculty has serious reservations about the leadership of President Allen," the report states.
A faculty group released the report titled, "Summary of President Benjamin J. Allen’s Five-year Evaluation by University of Northern Iowa Faculty." It was prepared by the UNI Faculty Presidential Review Committee on April 17.
University spokesman Jim O'Connor defended Allen, saying he has "worked diligently for nearly six years to lead the university and position it for the future."
"University leaders have a responsibility to make decisions that are in the best interests of our students and the taxpayers of the state of Iowa," O'Connor said. "Changes in higher education require proactive, strategic leadership to make tough choices while planning for the future."
Allen appreciates the Faculty Senate and will continue working with it and all of the UNI faculty, he said.
Faculty have been particularly vocal about their unhappiness with Allen in recent weeks, but this report is based on a survey taken before plans for severe cuts became public.
The report does praise Allen as being "highly respected within the cabinet," and that he is "considered a personable individual who treats people with respect and has effectively represented the university to external constituents."
"The administrators interviewed obviously held him in high regard," it states.
The report, though, focuses on the responses to a questionnaire, which pointed out dissatisfaction with "communication, lack of a clear vision for the future of the university, and how he has worked with the faculty during challenging budget situations."
The survey results showed that 63 percent of respondents describe Allen as poor or fair, while 17 percent rate him as satisfactory, good or excellent.
The survey was given in February prior to the announcement of plans to close Price Laboratory school, and a few weeks before academic cuts were announced.
Approximately 35 percent of eligible faculty participated.
The presidential review committee included James Jurgenson, Chair of the Faculty, Jeffrey Funderburk, Chair of the Faculty Senate, Lauren Nelson, Chair of the Graduate Faculty, Maureen Clayton, Chair of the Graduate Council, Gene Lutz, Director of the Center for Social and Behavioral Research.
Robert Huber
9:57 am on Saturday, April 21, 2012
The poor reviews for President Allen by faculty, and no confidence vote in his administration, is also a challenge for the Board of Regents. Will they continue their full support of the President as has been choreographed by a big public relations campaign or will they direct him to address expressed faculty concerns? For President Allen to have any hope in leading UNI in the future he needs to specifically address the concerns in the faculty evaluation by supporting and trusting his faculty to help remedy the situation and direct his administrators to do the same.
Adam Butler
2:55 pm on Saturday, April 21, 2012
How does one reconcile Jim O'Connor's view that Allen has shown "proactive, strategic leadership" with the faculty perception that he lacks "a clear vision for the future of the university"? The only way both could be correct is if Allen does, in fact, have a clear vision for the university, but he is unable or unwilling to share it with the faculty.
B.A. Morelli
7:03 pm on Saturday, April 21, 2012
Given the budget constraints in recent years, do you think if Ben Allen wasn't the president, and someone else was leading UNI there would be a different outcome? Is it possible he is just the scapegoat for decisions of the Legislature?
Adam Butler
10:01 pm on Saturday, April 21, 2012
Good question, Brian. The reduced appropriations by the Iowa legislature have put UNI on a starvation diet. This has undoubtedly made Allen's job more difficult. Still, developing plans in secret, violating principles of shared governance, and disproportionately cutting academics is not a way to win faculty friends.
B.A. Morelli
4:11 pm on Monday, April 23, 2012
It seems there are two issues. First, unhappiness about the cuts being made. Secondly, unhappiness about how they are being carried out. The university has acknowledged mistakes in their transparency, but are standing by the actions themselves.
Spencer Walrath
7:20 am on Tuesday, April 24, 2012
Where are the results from the student review of President Allen? Where students even given the opportunity? This would be a serious shortcoming of the review process if student input was not sought.