Bullying, in schools and online, has become a hot-button issue recently, with and the recent release of the documentary Bully, featuring a Sioux Falls boy.
The to participate in a panel discussion on bullying, and one of the messages they had for the community was that bullying does not exist in a vacuum. It takes a community conversation to begin to truly address it.
That is what this article seeks to do: start a conversation. We're asking for your comments and questions about bullying, and our panelists will respond and offer their insight.
Leave your questions and comments below.
Some of the members on our panel are:
Derek Hannah, Youth Sports Director at the Walnut Creek YMCA.
Linn-Mar High School student Matt Shankles was the subject of bullying after coming out as gay, but he has rather than give in.
Officer Jessica Jensen, School Resource Officer for the Johnston Community School District.
Dr. Warren J. Blumenfeld, Associate Professor, Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Iowa State University
Jen Alexander, School Counselor at Hansen Elementary in Cedar Falls.
Officer Mackenzie Sposeto, school resource officer in the Waukee school district.
Please feel free to jump in to the conversation at any time. Patch editors will be monitoring and moderating the comment stream.
An action like this also lets the bullied individual know that they aren't the one who is the problem. @Matt Shankles: What could fellow students have done (or did they do) to help you in your situation?
I'm all in favor of trying to raise consciousness about bullying as an issue, but I think the focus should be on modelling humane treatment of people, rather than on punishing the bullies more severely. Many of these "bullies" are themselves small children who need help, not vilification. If the anti-bullying campaign emphasizes channeling people's anger toward bullies, it could just end up modeling a punitive, dehumanizing way of treating other people.
There is another important way to help stop bullying, though, and that's addressing the role of bystanders. Research shows that 57% of the time, bullying stops in less than 10 seconds when peers intervene on behalf of the child being bullied (Drew, 2010). We must teach everyone what bullying is and what they can do to stop it. Bystanders who do nothing or laugh along with someone who is bullying encourage it to continue. When peers are what we call "up-standers" and stand up for the child being bullied, however, that is powerful. This is not to say that kids should "handle bullying" on their own. Rather, teaching children to be up-standers is one part of addressing this problem. That along with making sure adults are ready to intervene and know how to help both the person doing the bullying and the target is key. It definitely takes a collective effort to make our schools and communities safe for everyone.
Some researchers have defined the roles various people play. Dan Olweus, international researcher and bullying prevention specialist, enumerated the distinct and often overlapping roles enacted in these episodes:
2. Followers/Henchmen(women): those who are active in the bullying process, though a follower of the main “ringleader” bully(ies); 3. Supporter, Passive Bully/Bullies: those who passively support, condone, collude, or encourage the aggression; 4. Passive Supporter, Possible Bully: those who are unsure of ways to actively assist those who perpetrate the aggression, though they are with those who bully; 5. Disengaged Onlookers: sometimes referred to as “bystanders,” aware of the bullying behaviors, do nothing, often stay away from the incidents; 6. Possible Defender: those who could intervene on behalf of the targets of bullying, but for many reasons may feel disempowered, unsure of ways to assist, fearful of being a target themselves; 7. Defender of those Who are Bullied: those who either work proactively, or actually intervene, defend, and protect the targets of aggression; 8. Those Who Are Bullied, The One(s) Who Is/Are Exposed: the targets of aggression. This question brings to mind the old truism: “If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem.” Today as in the past, no truer words were ever uttered, for in the spectrum from occasional microaggressions to full-blown genocide, there is no such thing as an “innocent bystander.”
Right now, the approach of the Iowa City schools is indoctrination. The behavioral rewards program used in all the schools ("PBIS") is entirely about telling the students how to act, and then using material rewards to get them to comply. It has no component designed to get the kids thinking for themselves about right and wrong and how to treat other people. In the end, all it teaches is obedience to authority. I'm not saying the schools shouldn't have rules. But simply dictating rules does nothing to help kids develop their own moral and ethical reasoning about how to treat other people. Without more, it just models treating people like objects to be bossed around and manipulated. If we want kids to treat each other with dignity, we need to treat them with dignity, and engage them in reasoning about what's right and wrong -- not just tell them what to think.
Full thoughts here: http://ablogaboutschool.blogspot.com/2011/11/what-is-our-school-teaching-about.html
http://roseville.patch.com/articles/citizens-says-no-explanation-offered-for-closed-session-of-roseville-school
Essentially the student was bullied and the administration (arguably) didn't do enough to stop it, so the student's mother sent him to school with a stun gun. Even though he didn't use it to hurt anyone, the student was expelled for bringing a stun gun to school because of the school's weapons policy. So the administration was following its own necessary policies but it somehow seems to me like they produced the wrong results -- a perfect case of institutional failure. What do you experts think of what went on there?
So many things sports can help us learn ! :)
If it's a ref or coach being bullied, they're usually used to it and can probably block it out or just handle it. If it's over the top, usually the ref or a venue official will handle the bully. One of the reasons I don't envy referees!
In my mind bullying is abuse, and should be treated the same.
"Pros" here stand for "professionals," and not "pros" as in "pros and cons." Best, Warren Blumenfeld