Jonathan Gems
-
The Basics
-
Jonathan on Patch
-
More Stuff
Comments
-
On the article UPDATE (1:09 p.m.): Iowa GOP Head Declares Santorum Winner, Sort Of
-
On the article Instant Analysis: Who Won, Lost in the Iowa Caucus? Now You Tell Us What You Think
Jonathan Gems
6:04 pm on Tuesday, January 10, 2012
ReplyThe Iowan caucasus has always been conducted with open and visible voting. So the extraordinary, late-in-the-day introduction of secret vote-tabulation by the Republican leadership was a heads-up that election fraud was being planned. Immediately prior to the vote, the polls showed Ron Paul having over 50% of the vote - more than all the other candidates combined. But the Republican leadership was no way going to let Ron Paul win. Iowa's corrupt governor even said publicly that if Ron Paul did win Iowa, it 'wouldn't count'. In the event, the election was stolen from Ron Paul - as it will no doubt be in New Hampshire too (more easily because of their programmable voting machines).
America can no longer call itself a democracy because the American people are not allowed to choose the candidates they want to represent them. This is tragic - the end of a great nation. What is to be done? -
On the article Instant Analysis: Who Won, Lost in the Iowa Caucus? Now You Tell Us What You Think
Jonathan Gems
2:47 am on Wednesday, January 4, 2012
ReplyIn my district, Cedar Falls, Ron Paul won with 37 votes - Santorum came second with 27. What happened in the other districts?
-
On the article LETTER AND POLL: Hear That, Iowa? The Fat Lady’s Warmed Up and Ready to Sing
Jonathan Gems
6:48 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012
ReplyDr Ron Paul because he's the only candidate offering real hope and change.
Jonathan Gems
1:12 pm on Thursday, January 19, 2012
Going into the election, the polls showed Ron Paul had more votes than all the other candidates combined. He was clearly going to win. The GOP leadership don't want Ron Paul so they corrupted the election process. Iowans deserve better than this.